Acts of Perception and Their Objects

Pure acts are acts of the subject targeting objects of the real world. These acts are, precisely, the mediation between the subject and the object world.

After a few days of reading On the Problem of Empathy, I finally came up with a matrix showing the targets of some pure acts, categorizing them into two (2): the “I” and the other.

What is shown below is that the acts (the ones in the rows) can or cannot access certain parts of the individual (the ones in the columns).

The Matrix

Outer perception can access the physical body of the self, and also the physical and living body of the other. Bodily perception can access both physical and living body of the self. Inner perception can only access one’s own psyche. Empathy, which is a sui generis form of perception, can access the psyche of the other.

An insight that I get from this is that the subject, which is a psycho-physical individual, has itself acts which may be of help in getting a clearer picture of itself and of the other individual.

Clarification of Terms

  • The “I” is, of course, the self.
  • The other is another self, another “I.”
  • The psychic refers to the mind, the spirit, or the soul.
  • The physical body refers to the human body, but treated as a thing comparable to a pen or a chair.
  • The living body refers to the human body that has sensations.

The Three Acts of Perception (A Picture)

My mentor drew an illustration to show how the three acts of perception are different from each other.

The act of outer perception grasps the physical attributes of things.

The act of inner perception grasps one’s own psychic life.

The act of empathy grasps the other subject’s psychic life.

Outer Perception, Inner Perception and Empathy

Image by skeeze from Pixabay

My mentor told me to differentiate the three acts of perception: outer perception, inner perception and empathy. Below is the text I sent to my mentor.

On her On the Problem of Empathy, Edith Stein presents three acts of perception. These are empathy, outer perception and inner perception. These three acts are acts of pure consciousness.

Outer perception is a form of perception that grasps the physical attributes of concrete beings. This is what Stein said about outer perception: “Outer perception is a term for acts in which spatio-temporal concrete being and occurring come to me in embodied givenness. This being has the quality of being there itself right now; it turns this or that side to me and the side turned to me is embodied in a specific sense. It is primordially there in comparison with sides co-perceived but averted (On the Problem of Empathy, 6).” Outer perception, then, is an act that announces to the subject that there is another embodied concrete being before it. This is without mediation. Through the act of outer perception, the subject directly recognizes the object. The object is “there itself right now” before the subject. The object is directly present before the subject. Moreover, the act of outer perception grasps the whole object, its whole embodiment, even when there may be parts not shown. The subject, for example, may see a ball from a certain angle, so it has a limited view of the ball, but the subject is directly aware that it is seeing the whole embodiment of the ball. Through outer perception, thus, the subject can directly recognize embodied objects.

Inner perception is a form of perception that grasps the psychic life of one’s own self. Stein said, “To consider ourselves in inner perception, i.e., to consider our psychic ‘I’ and its attributes, means to see ourselves as we see another and as he sees us (On the Problem of Empathy, 88).” This means that inner perception is an act that directly perceives the subject’s psychic life. It is making oneself the object of one’s own inquiry. When it does this, it discovers its own attributes. The attributes that are perceived are the subject’s capacities. Remembering, perceiving, willing and moving are some of these attributes. Stein said, “Further, I may view my experiences in such a way that I no longer consider them as such, but as evidence of the transcendence of my individual and its attributes. My recollections announce my memory to me; my acts of outer perception announce the acuteness of my senses (not to be taken as sense organs, of course); my volition and conduct announce my energy, etc. And these attributes declare the nature of my individual to me. We can designate this viewing as inner perception of self (On the Problem of Empathy, 29-30).” So, when the subject perceives its own self through inner perception, it perceives its individuality and the attributes of this individuality.

Empathy, according to Edith Stein, is a sui generis form of perception. Even if it is still a perception, it is a class on its own, and therefore it is not an outer perception nor an inner perception. Empathy is the act that grasps or comprehends the other subject’s psychic life. The object, then, of empathy is the other subject. “Empathy is the form of perception in which ‘foreign experience is comprehended’ (Stein 2008). The object of empathic experience is consciousness that belongs to an I that is not the empathizer’s own (Burns, From I to You to We, 3).” In this sense, empathy would mean direct access to the experiential life of the other subject. When one empathizes with another subject, the empathizer grasps the experience of this other subject. Empathy, then, is a unique act because of the fact that the experience of the empathizer is primordial, while at the same time, the content of this experience is non-primordial. The content is non-primordial in the sense that the psychic life that is grasped is foreign in nature. Empathy, thus, is a pure act announcing the presence of another subject.

Empathy is similar to outer perception, but different from inner perception, in the sense that empathy’s object is another subject. In other words, what is being grasped through empathy is a concrete being other than oneself.

Empathy is similar to inner perception, but different from outer perception, in the sense that empathy targets the psychic life of the other subject. In other words, what is being grasped through empathy are experiences, but that these are not one’s own.


P.S. Surprise! I’m back to my blog! No need for a lengthy explanation. 🙂
P.P.S. The above text is my attempt to differentiate the three acts of perception, and therefore might be inaccurate or outright incorrect.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started